A model for industry engagement in the accreditation process
Best practices A model for industry engagement in the accreditation process Users: Policymakers, Industry, SMEs | Theme: Accreditation and certification | Action: Policy/guideline | Beneficiaries: Training Providers (Private), Training Providers (Public), Policymakers, Industry, SMEs | Countries: Ireland. Skillnet Ireland Skillnet Ireland Donal Grimes The EU Commision report titled Pact for Skills: Analysing of Upskilling and Reskilling Policy Initiatives and Identifying Best Practices” ranked the model deployed by Skillnet Ireland in Ireland, first out of 47 in benchmarking, based on overall average key performance metrics, as well as topping the analysis for impact on businesses and impact/contribution to the economy including to the digital and climate agenda. Central to the Skillnet Ireland model are the Skillnet Business Networks: clusters of private sector businesses that collaborate based on a sector, or multiple sectors within a region, to provide upskilling and reskilling programmes to companies. With 70 Skillnet Business Networks nationwide, companies can find a network based on a particular sector, or within a region. The business networks identify the skills needs impacting their region/sector and establish the requirements for the respective industry in relation to accreditation. The challenge? In the Irish context, the challenges nationally include: Fragmentation across sectors: Different industries and sectors often follow different accreditation frameworks (e.g., QQI in education, NSAI in standards, CORU in healthcare). Populating the talent pipeline and addressing skills shortages: There can be a disconnect between what training/education providers offer and what industry actually requires in accredited qualifications. SME Engagement and awareness: Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) often lack awareness, resources, or understanding of accreditation processes. Funding and support structures: Accreditation processes can be costly and resource-intensive. Lack of real time labour market intelligence: Difficulty in gathering timely and localised data on evolving industry needs. Our solution The Skillnet Ireland Business Network Model is built on a national framework of business networks. These networks act as intermediaries between enterprises and training providers, fostering collaboration and ensuring that training programmes are demand-driven and aligned with both sectoral and national priorities. Rather than relying solely on traditional education systems, the model empowers businesses—particularly SMEs—to identify critical skills gaps and co-develop training solutions that often lead to recognised accreditation. Business networks facilitate engagement across diverse sectors, reduce administrative burden, and support access to micro-credentials, recognition of prior learning (RPL), and formal qualifications. They also enable real-time intelligence gathering by maintaining close contact with employers, allowing for agile and targeted responses to emerging trends. This collaborative and flexible structure helps address a range of systemic challenges: it supports alignment across fragmented accreditation systems, ensures training is relevant and recognised, simplifies SME participation, and makes accreditation more accessible and cost-effective through shared resources and financial supports. Outcomes 1. Increased Alignment Between Industry and Accreditation Bridged the gap between industry needs and education offerings, resulting in more job-ready graduates and upskilled employees. Enabled the mainstreaming of micro-credentials and flexible learning pathways—recognised increasingly in formal systems. 2. Enhanced SME Participation in Accreditation and Upskilling Over 80% of Skillnet Ireland’s participating companies are SMEs, many of whom could struggle to access accredited training, without the Skillnet Ireland support systems and funding 3. Improved Responsiveness to Skills Shortages Real-time employer feedback through Skillnet Business Networks and rollout of new training (e.g., in AI, sustainability, cyber, medtech). Enabled the rapid scaling of talent pipelines in high-demand sectors (ICT, pharma, construction, green economy). Supported sectoral transformation by enabling existing workforces to transition into new, accredited roles (e.g. Offshore Wind Academy). 4. Reduced Regulatory and Administrative Burden Networks can act as a ‘navigator’ for regulatory complexity, streamlining access to compliance-related training and accreditation. 5. Increased Labour Market Intelligence and Policy Influence Networks support the production of sector-specific Talent and Skills Reports, influencing national policy and education programme development. Anticipated emerging skill gaps (e.g., cybersecurity, data governance, AI ethics), enabling pre-emptive programme development. Key takeaways Build governance structures that put employers in the lead of programme design. Avoid ‘top-down’ training mandates – instead, co-design solutions with end users (businesses) Create collaborative, peer-based training networks around shared industry needs or regional challenges. Use intermediaries (Chambers Ireland, industry groups) to build bridges between businesses and training/accreditation providers. Embed accreditation partners early in programme development. Use modular, stackable credentials that can build toward formal qualifications over time. Build agile programme structures that can pivot quickly. Establish ongoing labour market sensing mechanisms through direct employer feedback. Design services and communications specifically for SMEs, with practical guidance, shared services, and peer learning. Use localised/regional outreach and relationships to engage hard-to-reach businesses. Leverage real-time data from industry networks to inform policy and programme direction. Consider training networks as a two-way channel: delivering skills on the ground and gathering intelligence for policymakers. Learn more here
Use of the EDCI Issuer to issue micro-credentials
Best practices Use of the EDCI Issuer to issue micro-credentials Users: Training Providers (Private), Training Providers (Public) | Theme: Accreditation and certification | Action: Fremework/methodology | Beneficiaries: Training Providers (Private), Training Providers (Public), Learners (STEM background), Learners (Non-STEM background). DIS4SME DIS4SME Lisa Bilotti Giacomo Martirano Across Europe, there is a rapidly growing demand for digital skills and for mechanisms that formally recognise competences achieved through both formal and non‑formal education. Within this context, the DIS4SME (Data Interoperability Skills for SMEs) project contributes to the upskilling and reskilling of small and medium‑sized enterprises through targeted training on location data interoperability.As a consortium member, Epsilon Italia aimed to ensure that the learning outcomes achieved by participants in its courses were recognisable, verifiable, and aligned with EU policy frameworks for micro‑credentials. The challenge? The main challenge was to identify a cost‑effective and reliable system for issuing digital micro‑credentials compliant with the EU Recommendation on Micro‑Credentials.Most commercially available badge platforms were found to be limited in one or more of the following ways:Non‑compliance with the EU micro‑credentials frameworkRequirement for expensive licences or annual feesDependence on restrictive national accreditation or proprietary systemsThese limitations hindered training providers from adopting micro‑credentials effectively and consistently across European contexts. Our solution Secure, authentic, EU‑compliant credentials: the Digital badges issued via the EDCI Issuer are fully aligned with the EU micro‑credentials framework and guaranteed by a qualified e‑seal.Interoperability and transparency: Credentials can be embedded directly in the Europass CV, enhancing recognition of skills across Europe.Cost‑effectiveness: Epsilon Italia achieved credential issuance without paying licence fees or using proprietary systems.Scalability: The organisation plans to issue at least 100 digital credentials during the first year of implementation. Outcomes The membership to the EFMD Global Network, and the eligibility to EQUIS accreditation were the first steps achieved in the process of EQUIS accreditation. The achievement of these milestones resulted in a set of outcomes: 15% increase in recruitment of international students; 1 new international exchange program with an EQUIS internationally accredited HEI; International recognition in accreditation of educational offer in advanced digital skills, with one new co-funded project with other EQUIS accredited HEIs; Improvement in national and international ranking for master programs Integration of EQUIS methodology with European approach to micro-credentials to further increase the quality level of educational offer. Key takeaways Integrate a qualified e‑seal, as required by the EDCI Issuer, to ensure legal authenticity and integrity. Update internal processes early to guarantee smooth technical integration with the EU’s credential infrastructure. Invest in staff training for managing digital credentialing workflows and maintaining compliance with EU standards. Avoid dependence on commercial badge platforms by adopting open EU‑provided tools that foster transparency and trust. Embed credentials within the Europass CV to enhance learners’ employability and cross‑sector recognition. Build long‑term collaboration with technical partners to sustain e‑seal management and alignment with evolving EU frameworks. Learn more here
A comprehensive accreditation system of educational offering: International accreditation of awarding HEI
Best practices A comprehensive accreditation system of educational offering: International accreditation of awarding HEI Users: Training Providers (Private), Training Providers (Public) | Theme: Accreditation and certification | Action: Fremework/methodology | Beneficiaries: Training Providers (Private), Training Providers (Public). xAIM xAIM Maria Chiara Demartini In 2020 the xAIM consortium aimed at designing a high-quality master program in explainable AI applied to healthcare management. Although each beneficiary was supposed to contribute in term of the design and the teaching staff, the vocational master program had to be delivered by one HEI only. To ensure high-level standards of quality delivered at each phase of the design, organization, roll-out and monitoring of master program, the consortium looked for internationally recognised systems for accreditation to show outstanding excellence in quality assurance.Moreover, one of the sustainability strategies formulated by the consortium entailed the delivery of single modules of the xAIM master programs, beyond the entire master program. The challenge? The xAIM consortium faced multiple challenges: As an international consortium, xAIM didn’t want to rely on one single national regulation for the accreditation of the master program, in order to promote an internationally recognised high-quality master program. Since only one HEI was expected to award the master diploma, other national regulations were not necessarily fit for purpose. A broader and more international quality assurance framework was expected to be adopted for the xAIM master program. The sustainability strategy included opportunities to deliver single modules, beyond the whole master programs. Hence, a comprehensive accreditation system was needed, including both bachelor’s, master’s programs, and short courses. Our solution An internationally recognised accreditation system was selected to quality assure the entire educational offer of the awarding institution. It is worth noting that there are alternative international accreditation systems for business schools. However, the consortium decided to apply for the EFMD quality improvement system (EQUIS), managed by EFMD Global, since it has a European focus. The following explains how each of the identified challenges are addressed: High-quality standards in master’s programs accreditation Challenge: One single national regulation for the accreditation of the master program could be partial and lack some international requirements in terms of accreditation of master programsHow the EQUIS accreditation process facilitates solutions:EQUIS is a comprehensive principle-based system to improve the quality of awarding institutions;• It has strongly agreed upon principles, though flexible implementation, based on national context and local needs;• EQUIS provides learning communities, which are focused on specific principles (e.g., internationalisation) or thematic areas (e.g., the role of AI in educational offer). Difficulty in selecting another (set of) national regulatory frameworkChallenge: Since only one HEI was expected to award the master diploma, other national regulations were not necessarily fit for purpose How the EQUIS accreditation process facilitates solutions:• EQUIS is an internationally recognized standard, acknowledging national context, but promoting a standardised international process for accreditation of HEIs• EQUIS was initially developed in and for European universities, without a specific national framework in mind Need for a supranational accreditation system Challenge: Need for an international quality assurance framework to overcome the limits of national regulationsHow the EQUIS accreditation process facilitates solutions:• It is an internationally recognized standard, based on a benchmarking approach• Although it was initially intended to improve the quality of the educational offer of European universities, EFMD has now extended its scope both geographically, with a global outreach of EQUIS accredited institutions, and institutionally, covering the accreditation of non-university training institutions too; • EQUIS has a strong experience in the field of accreditation of business schools, although its principles and processes are adapting to the ever-changing international educational landscape. Comprehensive accreditation system Challenge: Need to assure short courses and longer programsHow the EQUIS accreditation process facilitates solutions:• EQUIS is an institutional accreditation system covering bachelor’s, master’s, PhD’s, executive programs, and other educational offer;• Being a comprehensive quality improvement system, EQUIS provides support to accredited HEIs in enhancing the quality of the entire educational offer, from multiple and interlinked perspectives;• EQUIS provides HEIs with a global quality recognition of their educational offer. Outcomes The membership to the EFMD Global Network, and the eligibility to EQUIS accreditation were the first steps achieved in the process of EQUIS accreditation. The achievement of these milestones resulted in a set of outcomes: 15% increase in recruitment of international students; 1 new international exchange program with an EQUIS internationally accredited HEI; International recognition in accreditation of educational offer in advanced digital skills, with one new co-funded project with other EQUIS accredited HEIs; Improvement in national and international ranking for master programs Integration of EQUIS methodology with European approach to micro-credentials to further increase the quality level of educational offer. Key takeaways Institutional accreditation (e.g., EQUIS) is key when HEIs and training institutions are looking for a comprehensive accreditation system for their educational offer. Being principle-based, the EQUIS accreditation process is a replicable, yet flexible, strategic benchmarking tool to enhance the quality of the HEI’s educational offer. Institutional accreditation systemWhat worked: The accreditation system is not targeting a single program, or a short course, but the whole HEI or business school awarding the diplomas or certifications.This approach ensures accreditation is coherent throughout the HEI’s educational offerReplicable Lesson:Adopting comprehensive accreditation systems can lower the time to seek for accreditation of one additional program or courseThe whole institution is involved in the quality assurance process, leading to change in the mindset Standardised and widely adopted accreditation systemWhat worked: EQUIS is an internationally recognised and globally adopted accreditation system.In order to get immediate international recognition of the high-quality of its educational offer, the HEI can look for a widely adopted international standard.Replicable Lesson:An initial scope of the accreditation systems available in the market can help selecting the one best fitting the training institution’s needs.Benchmarking of leading HEIs can support the choice of an institutional accreditation system and its implementation Lessons learnt on the institutional accreditation system can be shared among partner HEIsWhat worked: More experienced HEIs in institutional accreditation systems can mentor other partner HEIs, in the same consortium, in their journey towards institutional accreditation.Replicable Lesson:Sharing achieved outcomes
From Classroom to Collaboratorium: Rethinking Learning Spaces in European Joint Masters
Best practices From Classroom to Collaboratorium: Rethinking Learning Spaces in European Joint Masters Users: Training Providers (Private), Training Providers (Public) | Theme: Programme Development | Action: Education programme/course | Beneficiaries: Learners (STEM background), Learners (Non-STEM background). EURIDICE EURIDICE Emiliano Grimaldi Pietro Nunziante Contr: Anna Bon, Hans Akkermans In international joint master studies, students/learners and educators are inherently spread over different locations and countries. Only remote/online teaching is not a good educational approach. Community formation through in-person and face-to-face contact and collaborative work are also needed, and must be blended with remote virtual components.Students with different educational backgrounds, from different institutions, countries and cultures, collaborate in challenge-based master-level research and educational projects for societal impact. Building a community of learners is key to successful learning. The challenge? How can we build and educate young professionals to be both skilled and reflective for the Digital Society? How should these innovative curricula look like? How can we give our students a sense of belonging to a group, in an international, digitally connected context? How can we avoid that every student is working together while being alone behind their computer screen? Our solution Our proposed solution was coined: Collaboratorium. This is both a hybrid digital/physical interconnected workspace, and an educational concept. It combines onsite in-presence classrooms and workspaces, connected via digital collaboration bridges. In a Collaboratorium approach students tackle real-world “wicked” problems and work in small interdisciplinary, and often transdisciplinary teams, in the design of socio-technical solutions, through user-centered and community-centered approaches. Outcomes What have we already achieved through the implementation of the educational concept of the Collaboratorium? To gain and share experiences with this innovative educational concept, EURIDICE partners have implemented a series of pilots, through master projects. All projects embody the societally-oriented ambitions and are related to the Sustainable Development Goals. The idea is to co-design and build digital, socio-technical solutions for real world problems formulated with partners in the Global South. Our SME consortium partners are co-supervising a number of these projects, related to food security, health and wellbeing, and adaptation to climate change. Preliminary outcomes, as of 1 February 2025: 15 master theses, produced through this educational concept. Key takeaways Virtual education is efficient to train people remotely, however, presential collaboration is important for human well-being and enhances learning capacity and creativity. We advise to design your education such that groups are together in one space, while virtually communicating with other groups who are remote. A Collaboratorium requires a careful design of both physical spaces, digital international collaboration tools, and virtual spaces in an integrated whole. Learn more here